Hi,
We are developing a product that involves ESP32 that communicates with Android/IOs app over BLE. Since we develop software for both sides of the communication, I wanted to ask what is it that we don't need, in terms of "standard" BLE communication. Out ESP32 application should only be accessible by our Smartphone application, and even that is not all - there will be one ESP32 per one Smartphone. Each ESP32 should be uniquely recognized by the matching phone, so if two ESP32s are in vicinity, it the phone will connect to correct ESP32.
I guess ESP32 needs to advertise as usual by sending it's address, but is it necessary to send service UUID? Our Smartphone application knows what it is. Same question is valid for other UUIDs or for maximum character value sizes. Would removal of these fields make the communication any safer?
What would you suggest in terms of security and simplicity of authorization? Do you think bonding is still the best/simplest option?
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
BLE - Control over both peers
Return to “General Discussion”
Jump to
- English Forum
- Explore
- News
- General Discussion
- FAQ
- Documentation
- Documentation
- Sample Code
- Discussion Forum
- Hardware
- ESP-IDF
- ESP-BOX
- ESP-ADF
- ESP-MDF
- ESP-WHO
- ESP-SkaiNet
- ESP32 Arduino
- IDEs for ESP-IDF
- ESP-AT
- ESP IoT Solution
- ESP RainMaker
- Rust
- ESP8266
- Report Bugs
- Showcase
- Chinese Forum 中文社区
- 活动区
- 乐鑫活动专区
- 讨论区
- 全国大学生物联网设计竞赛乐鑫答疑专区
- ESP-IDF 中文讨论版
- 《ESP32-C3 物联网工程开发实战》书籍讨论版
- 中文文档讨论版
- ESP-AT 中文讨论版
- ESP-BOX 中文讨论版
- ESP IoT Solution 中文讨论版
- ESP-ADF 中文讨论版
- ESP Mesh 中文讨论版
- ESP Cloud 中文讨论版
- ESP-WHO 中文讨论版
- ESP-SkaiNet 中文讨论版
- ESP 生产支持讨论版
- 硬件问题讨论
- 项目展示
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 89 guests
- All times are UTC
- Top
- Delete cookies
About Us
Espressif Systems is a fabless semiconductor company providing cutting-edge low power WiFi SoCs and wireless solutions for wireless communications and Internet of Things applications. ESP8266EX and ESP32 are some of our products.