Hi everybody,
I need to write a lot (around 1000) of small files (100 bytes each). I'm currently using FATfs components and wear-leaveling.
It takes a long time to write them (more than 10minutes).
I wonder if SPIFFS could be more quick respect to FATFS or is there a low level method to write in flash directly but we the possibility to use a filesystem to open and read the files after the transfer has been completed.
Is it possible or is there any documentation/examples to check?
Thanks
SPIFFS vs FATFS write speed
Re: SPIFFS vs FATFS write speed
Hi
I'm wondering if you found an answer to this ?
I've the same question
Thanks
Jerome
I'm wondering if you found an answer to this ?
I've the same question
Thanks
Jerome
Re: SPIFFS vs FATFS write speed
I've found in my experience FatFs (plus wearleveling) to be faster than SPIFFS.
But I really wan't to try LittleFS.
Here's an interesting benchmark.
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/8316
But I really wan't to try LittleFS.
Here's an interesting benchmark.
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/8316
Opening/writing 4000B/closing a file is about 8 times faster with littlefs than with spiffs
Opening/reading 4000B/closing a file is about 5 times faster with littlefs than with spiffs
Formatting is about 500 times faster with littlefs than with spiffs
Mounting is about 60 times faster with littlefs than with spiffs
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 124 guests