writing to NVS
Re: writing to NVS
Yes, and that's correct. I don't know how to reconcile that with the passage I cited, but I'm inclined to think it's an error.
Re: writing to NVS
Doesn't strike me as an error. The statement that it's max 15 characters is specific to this implementation. The statement that it's at least 15 char is generic to all implementations. I.e. there are probably other implementations of this code that allow more than 15 char. Basically it's saying that if you don't know otherwise, you can safely assume the max length of 15.mzimmers wrote:Yes, and that's correct. I don't know how to reconcile that with the passage I cited, but I'm inclined to think it's an error.
John A
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ulaoulao and 114 guests