Is the pipeline_tcp_client example working correctly on newer ADF+IDF's?

crgregersen
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:33 am

Is the pipeline_tcp_client example working correctly on newer ADF+IDF's?

Postby crgregersen » Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:58 pm

Hi,

On a LyraT-mini.

I'm trying to get the: esp-adf/examples/get-started/pipeline_tcp_client
working. I run into the following problem:

E (4100) esp-tls: [sock=54] select() timeout
E (4100) TRANSPORT_BASE: Failed to open a new connection: 32774
E (4100) TCP_STREAM: _tcp_open, getsockopt failed (-1)
E (4100) AUDIO_ELEMENT: [tcp] AEL_STATUS_ERROR_OPEN,-1
W (4110) AUDIO_ELEMENT: [tcp] audio_element_on_cmd_error,7
E (4110) TCP_STREAM: Already closed
W (4120) AUDIO_ELEMENT: IN-[mp3] AEL_IO_ABORT
E (4120) MP3_DECODER: Failed to read audio data (line 129)

First I thought it was because the IP address was not assigned yet, but that looked ok.

Looks like 32774 is :
ESP_ERR_ESP_TLS_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT (0x8006): new connection in esp_tls_low_level_conn connection timeouted

I've tried many combinations of ADF+IDF (MacOS).
Any ideas?

best regards,
/C

crgregersen
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:33 am

Re: Is the pipeline_tcp_client example working correctly on newer ADF+IDF's?

Postby crgregersen » Wed Jul 03, 2024 11:38 am

In the tcp_client_stream component file : components/audio_stream/tcp_client_stream.c
The connection timeout is set to 100ms.. which considering we are working on an embedded target is very very low

If I increase this to 1000ms it works..

#define CONNECT_TIMEOUT_MS 1000

crgregersen
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:33 am

Re: Is the pipeline_tcp_client example working correctly on newer ADF+IDF's?

Postby crgregersen » Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:46 am

I really wonder if this has worked on any type of system before.

With a timeout of only 100ms on the select call, if the connection has not been created within that timeout the code (the select call) will fail.
I believe the best I've seen is somewhere around 300ms.
Maybe my WiFi setup is slow, but nonetheless the tcp audio stream should be able to handle that.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests