ESP32 lacks good small boards, dual base and stacking possibility. Why?
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2020 3:48 pm
I think that ESP32 lacks a good ecosystem of small boards for small projects.
ESP32 boards tends to be too big for many applications and the lack of the stacking possibility,
the lack of shields, the lack of dual or triple base makes me choose ESP8266 on D1 Mini boards every new project.
D1 Mini single, dual and triple base are a must have...
I love those base. Are super awesome and super convenient for small projects,
they are very convenient even for soldering components on it.
With those boards you can stack components one on top of the other,
you have a ground plane without the needs of horrible soldering, you have a 5V and a 3.3V plane, and on dual or triple base
the PINs layout is repeated three times.
See how convenient they are:
Is there something this small and this convenient even for ESP32?
ESP32 boards tends to be too big for many applications and the lack of the stacking possibility,
the lack of shields, the lack of dual or triple base makes me choose ESP8266 on D1 Mini boards every new project.
D1 Mini single, dual and triple base are a must have...
I love those base. Are super awesome and super convenient for small projects,
they are very convenient even for soldering components on it.
With those boards you can stack components one on top of the other,
you have a ground plane without the needs of horrible soldering, you have a 5V and a 3.3V plane, and on dual or triple base
the PINs layout is repeated three times.
See how convenient they are:
Is there something this small and this convenient even for ESP32?