LTS - Long Term Support for Software ( example ESP-IDF )
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 10:02 am
Hi Guys
i read just in time the line in released ESP-IDF V3.3 LTS:
"Version 3.3 is the first ESP-IDF Long Term Support release. ESP-IDF v3.3.x will be supported for 2.5 years, until March 2022."
i have few questions:
from where do these timelines TLS come from?
we know Espressif provides a minimum longevity commitment to the product series. and we can read that too.
how and where is LTS regulated for development software?
what applies to bugs in "older versions", expired versions?
Is there a general chapter for it, is it determined arbitrarily, or is there clear guidance?
I am reading for the first time of such TLS timelines, it's new for me in the live of espressif to SOFT
not that I have something against it, that's right, full support from me,
but maybe it would be good to have a set of rules
which determines, for which timeframe which development versions as a general rule receive support or are supervised.
this should be included in the longevity commitment, so there is no misunderstanding, which is why "older versions" are no longer supported, and to indicate newer versions.
just a thought
best wishes
rudi
i read just in time the line in released ESP-IDF V3.3 LTS:
"Version 3.3 is the first ESP-IDF Long Term Support release. ESP-IDF v3.3.x will be supported for 2.5 years, until March 2022."
i have few questions:
from where do these timelines TLS come from?
we know Espressif provides a minimum longevity commitment to the product series. and we can read that too.
how and where is LTS regulated for development software?
what applies to bugs in "older versions", expired versions?
Is there a general chapter for it, is it determined arbitrarily, or is there clear guidance?
I am reading for the first time of such TLS timelines, it's new for me in the live of espressif to SOFT
not that I have something against it, that's right, full support from me,
but maybe it would be good to have a set of rules
which determines, for which timeframe which development versions as a general rule receive support or are supervised.
this should be included in the longevity commitment, so there is no misunderstanding, which is why "older versions" are no longer supported, and to indicate newer versions.
just a thought
best wishes
rudi