BLE-only power consumption
Re: BLE-only power consumption
Any news for the low power implementation ?
Re: BLE-only power consumption
I wish to ask a question about power consumption with WiFi and BLE turned off separately. when both BLE and WiFi turned off I have consumption around 20mA. when both turned ON consumption is 160mA. but I have same power consumption when only BLE turned ON (and wifi off) or WiFi turned ON (and BLE off). is there any explanation of above?
also I hope that BLE lower power modes will be supported soon..
also I hope that BLE lower power modes will be supported soon..
Re: BLE-only power consumption
Has there been progress regarding BT-LE low-power modes?ESP_Sprite wrote:FYI: The BT(LE) drivers in esp-idf as of now aren't optimized for power yet, so while the hardware should support low-power modes, there's no software to use them yet. We're working on getting the needed changes, however.
When will BT-LE connectivity through deep sleep be possible?
Thank you
Re: BLE-only power consumption
Hello,dave111 wrote:Has there been progress regarding BT-LE low-power modes?ESP_Sprite wrote:FYI: The BT(LE) drivers in esp-idf as of now aren't optimized for power yet, so while the hardware should support low-power modes, there's no software to use them yet. We're working on getting the needed changes, however.
When will BT-LE connectivity through deep sleep be possible?
Thank you
A Bluetooth Low-Energy device without support for low-power modes? Is there really no new information you can share about this? I would very much like to better understand the situation.
Maybe such info was already shared. But I am unable to find it.
Thank you.
Re: BLE-only power consumption
Agreed, quite puzzling: "A Bluetooth Low-Energy device without support for low-power modes?" ?????
I got a code working in BLE with external interrupts connected to an Android phone via MIT App Inventor 2 program, but the power consumption is over 170 mAh in normal mode, and putting the ESP-32 to sleep and waking up again takes couple of seconds per cycle. The chip gets hot and I am reluctant to enclose it in a project which may operate outdoors.
So been looking at the nrF5x, the BT-12, the HM-13, BlueDuino, BlueFruit, DA14580 instead.
I got a code working in BLE with external interrupts connected to an Android phone via MIT App Inventor 2 program, but the power consumption is over 170 mAh in normal mode, and putting the ESP-32 to sleep and waking up again takes couple of seconds per cycle. The chip gets hot and I am reluctant to enclose it in a project which may operate outdoors.
So been looking at the nrF5x, the BT-12, the HM-13, BlueDuino, BlueFruit, DA14580 instead.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 6:53 pm
Re: BLE-only power consumption
I'm sorry if my comment is not seen as constructive, just sharing my experience, no affiliation with Nordic: I've ended up using nRF52832 and mbed OS for the project I originally asked this question for. Quite a comfortable solution if you don't need the whole Wifi stack, only BLE.fe7565 wrote:
So been looking at the nrF5x, the BT-12, the HM-13, BlueDuino, BlueFruit, DA14580 instead.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:48 pm
Re: BLE-only power consumption
Just checking in if the latest ESP-IDF has support for less power consumption during BTLE?
kind regards
Ian.
kind regards
Ian.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:48 pm
Re: BLE-only power consumption
*Bump* Any progress on this Espressif? We'd really love to be able to transmit a beacon every few seconds while averaging < 100uA but this just isn't possible at the moment.
Re: BLE-only power consumption
@Espressif I've been waiting for a year and you still haven't answered.
-
- Posts: 9708
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 4:08 am
Re: BLE-only power consumption
Yes, there's power saving in BLE mode now. See e.g. this issue for more discussion. Note that the ESP32 is not a chip specifically optimized for BLE use, so even with optimizations it may use more power than dedicated BLE chips.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], slaboure and 117 guests