Antenna matching network question
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:00 pm
Hi,
I'm designing a board with the ESP32.
I noticed that in the latest hardware guideline, I mean the version V 2.4, the matching network changed.
At chapter "2.1.5 RF" the document says:
"A PI-type matching network is essential for antenna matching in the circuit design.
C-L-C structure is recommended for the matching network."
That network has no decoupling capacitor between the antenna and the LNA_IN pin of the ESP32.
I've always seen one decoupling capacitor between antennas and RF chips.
The typical value of this capacitor is just a few pF and it does not alter the matching network.
QUESTION 1
--------------
Are you guys aware that between the antenna and the ESP32 there isn't the decoupling capacitor?
QUESTION 2
--------------
Have you ever tested C-L-C structure on the ESP32?
QUESTION 3
--------------
All ESP32 modules have a matching network that is not a C-L-C PI-type network.
Why did you change the topology of the matching network after years of well established C-C-L topology.
Thanks,
Enrico Migliore
I'm designing a board with the ESP32.
I noticed that in the latest hardware guideline, I mean the version V 2.4, the matching network changed.
At chapter "2.1.5 RF" the document says:
"A PI-type matching network is essential for antenna matching in the circuit design.
C-L-C structure is recommended for the matching network."
That network has no decoupling capacitor between the antenna and the LNA_IN pin of the ESP32.
I've always seen one decoupling capacitor between antennas and RF chips.
The typical value of this capacitor is just a few pF and it does not alter the matching network.
QUESTION 1
--------------
Are you guys aware that between the antenna and the ESP32 there isn't the decoupling capacitor?
QUESTION 2
--------------
Have you ever tested C-L-C structure on the ESP32?
QUESTION 3
--------------
All ESP32 modules have a matching network that is not a C-L-C PI-type network.
Why did you change the topology of the matching network after years of well established C-C-L topology.
Thanks,
Enrico Migliore