I tried NimBLE. I changed the settings and got the best result at 60 packets per second.: 2 1 6 2 2 1 2 9 2 1 2 7 2 2 1 20 3 6 15 2 23 6 2 19 17 3 2 1 7 77 9 29 3 3 4 1 2 2 8 16 2 17 2 2 2 2 37 3 3 8 3 2 36 3 2 3 25 3 1 2 30 44 7 9 3 9 2 1 2 1 58 6 11 7 2 1 8 1 7 16 2 1 1 27 2 16 2 25 8 15 1 2 20 8 ...

Changed the parameters: conn_params.max_int = 0x06; // *1.25ms conn_params.min_int = 0x06; // *1.25ms When sending at a rate of 50 frames per second, I get the following result (On the receiving side, the delay between packets (ms): 25 16 16 17 22 23 23 15 19 22 28 17 14 20 21 25 21 12 22 13 20 47 4...

Hi. Maybe I asked the question incorrectly? How to make the example send a packet as quickly as possible after executing the function: esp_blue_cats_and_indicated(ESP_GETS_temp, param_write_conn_id_temp, heart_rate_handle_table[IDX_CHAR_VAL_A], size(esp_blu_buffer), esp_ble_buffer, false); It turns ...

Hi. Using the gatts_table_creat_demo example esp-idf-v5.3.1. The minimum number of changes. In the main loop, it should send packets every 19 ms. while (1) { esp_ble_gatts_send_indicate(ESP_GATTS_temp, param_write_conn_id_temp, heart_rate_handle_table[IDX_CHAR_VAL_A], size of(esp_ble_buffer), esp_bl...