That is exactly my problem, it is not working, I guess it is a different procedure in this case, but I really do not know how I could make it work and I cannot find absolutely any information regarding this problem.

Hello M4L4SS1S3. I am not talking about debugging the physical device (ESP32), in my post I mention that I have difficult debugging the application in the host machine (here there is no physical ESP32). So the permissions of udev are irrelevant in this post. Important to read: https://docs.espressif...

Good, I am getting more and more in my platform transition to ESP-IDF to take advantage of those unique characteristics that only this framework offers (from the Linux side). Recently I stop with https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/stable/esp32/api-guides/host-apps.html which seemed very ...

Any idea what could be going on or is it a really complex issue?

I don't know if setup() and loop() can run on another Core, but in my case it always runs on Core 0.

And I don't think adding delays to it will make Core 0 run any faster. What I want is to find out why Core 0 is not as fast as Core 1.

In my case, setup() and loop() use Core 1.

And yes, that is my intention, to use all the power and time of Core 0 to verify that there is nothing running behind the scenes.

Using delays or deleting the task has nothing to do with what I'm trying to do.

Interesting, I didn't think of that possibility.

If so, how can I disable these services?

At no time will I use WiFi or Bluetooth in this project in case you were wondering.

Good afternoon community... I have set myself an ambitious project in relation to VGA and Esp32 (using a library of course, maybe you know it), but using both Esp32 Cores in their true and maximum computing capacity. Unfortunately FreeRTOS is a big obstacle to get to such a point, I can tolerate the...