It's an old issue, but an obvious need. Here's the closest thing I have found from espressif. But it does not support IoS. Is there more?
https://github.com/espressif/esp-iot-so ... th/ble_ota
Search found 14 matches
- Thu Mar 02, 2023 9:09 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ESP32 OTA via BLE
- Replies: 25
- Views: 50634
- Wed Feb 22, 2023 3:52 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ESP32 SPI SCLK GPIO drive strength
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3455
Re: ESP32 SPI SCLK GPIO drive strength
I recently tested this on SPI lines to reduce EMI, it appears to work great on an ESP32-S3. Setting 0 might be too extreme depending on your clock rate. gpio_set_drive_capability((gpio_num_t)brd->GPIO_LCD_CLK, GPIO_DRIVE_CAP_0); gpio_set_drive_capability((gpio_num_t)brd->GPIO_LCD_DIN, GPIO_DRIVE_CAP...
- Tue Nov 08, 2022 12:19 am
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: \examples\peripherals\gpio\matrix_keyboard Example not working on S3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1676
Re: \examples\peripherals\gpio\matrix_keyboard Example not working on S3
True but documentation should replace the role if code. These are supposed to be examples for most platforms used by newcomers. This would be much better. #ifndef CONFIG_IDF_TARGET_ESP32S2 #error This example only supported on ESP32S2 #endif From what I can tell the S3's dedicated GPIO does not supp...
- Mon Nov 07, 2022 5:38 pm
- Forum: ESP-IDF
- Topic: \examples\peripherals\gpio\matrix_keyboard Example not working on S3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1676
\examples\peripherals\gpio\matrix_keyboard Example not working on S3
I see other topics that the matrix_keyboard example only works for devices with dedicated GPIO. But it seems to only have been tested with the S2, not the S3 which also has dedicated GPIO. Although the S3 does seem to lack this definition: SOC_DEDIC_GPIO_HAS_INTERRUPT Could this work on on an S3 wit...
- Tue Oct 25, 2022 5:24 am
- Forum: IDEs for ESP-IDF
- Topic: vscode ESP-IDF Setup error
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4002
Re: vscode ESP-IDF Setup error
Deleting both the c:\users\username\esp\esp-idf and c:\mos then restarting the installer again appears to have solved it.
- Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:58 am
- Forum: IDEs for ESP-IDF
- Topic: vscode ESP-IDF Setup error
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4002
vscode ESP-IDF Setup error
I cannot use extension to install esp-idf 4.4.2 (release version) ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools.command.build' The error message is difficult to understand, should I open an issue on https://github.com/espressif/vscode-esp-idf-extension/issues/new?assignees=&labels=bug-report&temp...
- Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:32 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ESP_RF_Test_tool upload error
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1872
ESP_RF_Test_tool upload error
The lab is scheduled, but the test tool will not upload over serial. I can only assume it's because it changes the baud rate for upload from what is selected 115200 to 921600 which is more than my FTDI cable can support. Console: ESP_MAC: 00:00:00:00:00:00 Connecting........_____....._____....._____...
- Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:35 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: GPIO34-39 pullup workaround?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4758
Re: GPIO34-39 pullup workaround?
As I mentioned, it does not appear to work. Either I am misunderstanding this change, or it is not used when using the Arduino framework.
I also tried using:
I also tried using:
- rtc_gpio_set_direction(myport , RTC_GPIO_MODE_INPUT_ONLY);
- rtc_gpio_pullup_en(myport);
- Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:38 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: GPIO34-39 pullup workaround?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4758
GPIO34-39 pullup workaround?
I have a PCB where I need pullups on GPIO34-39, because I was not aware the software ones do not work. The documentation is very misleading, they should not be called GPIO at all, but I digress.. However, I also see this post that suggests you can workaround by using the RTC subsystem, but I was not...
- Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:32 pm
- Forum: Hardware
- Topic: ESP32-WROOM-32D and ESP-PROG
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14890
Re: ESP32-WROOM-32D and ESP-PROG
@joeservo Sorry I did not see this.
By manual I meant pressing the button to pull GPIO0 low, rather then letting the RTS/DTR do it.
I found that the 100nF cap I had on GPIO causes problems, my board only works to automatically program with no cap.
By manual I meant pressing the button to pull GPIO0 low, rather then letting the RTS/DTR do it.
I found that the 100nF cap I had on GPIO causes problems, my board only works to automatically program with no cap.